Skip to content Skip to footer

An ‘unwanted journey’: how the immune microenvironment may contribute to breast cancer

By Joyce J.I. Catsman

An ‘unwanted journey’

Sarah* enjoyed her student life like everyone else, until the day she discovered a lump in her breast. At first, she did not dwell on it and continued about her every-day routine. However, it remained in the back of her mind that breast cancer runs in the family. Sarah decided to go to her general practitioner and agreed on some tests, which revealed that she had a BRCA mutation that led to an early stage of abnormal cell growth called ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The option she was offered was surgical removal of her breasts, which stopped her world and started her on what is known as an ‘unwanted journey’1. Worldwide, 20-25% of diagnosed breast cancers are DCIS, which occurs more often in women than in men. This means that one out of five women with hazardous breast cancer go through such an unwanted journey in their lifetime2. This article discusses how researchers are working to develop accurate biomarkers and possible therapies for DCIS, to prevent the ‘unwanted journey’ for many just like Sarah.

DCIS, what is that?

DCIS is a potential breast cancer precursor lesion where unregulated epithelial cells grow inside ductal structures that produce milk upon pregnancy, named terminal duct lobular units (TDLUs) (Figure 1)3,4,5. Some risk factors for DCIS, include obesity, lifestyle choices such as smoking, and rarely familial mutations such a BRCA mutations6,7,8. Not every DCIS progresses to an invasive disease9. About 80% of all DCIS lesions are asymptomatic, while the remaining 20% are associated with nipple discharge and/or a palpable lump. However, patients are often overtreated due to the lack of biomarkers that can distinguish DCIS lesions that progress to invasive disease from those that remain indolent and do not require treatment. To prevent the development of hazardous breast cancer, women at-risk – who carry a BRCA mutation – typically have their breasts surgically removed10,11.

Figure 1: Breast cancer development. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an early stage of breast cancer where epithelial cells grow abnormally in the milk ducts. These abnormal cells can potentially become invasive breast cancer. In invasive ductal carcinoma, the abnormal cells breach the protective layer around the ducts and spread further into the breast. Source: Made by Joyce Catsman via Biorender

New insights into the initiation of the ‘unwanted journey’

As tumors begin to grow, the cancerous cells change the organization of the tissue they reside in, leading to morphological changes that are recognized in cancer research as pre-neoplastic lesions. These tissue changes carry cancerous traits but have not yet metastasized and pose no immediate risk to the patient8. In 2021, Messal and his colleagues tracked such morphological aberrations in the TDLUs of surgically removed human breasts12. These aberrations were found both in breast tissues of BRCA mutation carriers without DCIS or cancer, and in healthy disease-free breasts that did not include DCIS, cancer, or BRCA mutations. This indicates that human breast tissue is already changing in a normal ‘healthy’ setting before it can be classified as DCIS or breast cancer. The researchers identified these aberrations via a new 3D-microscopy technique. They derived this method from a previously developed 3D technique called fast light-microscopic analysis of antibody-stained whole organs (FLASH)13,14. In FLASH, surgically removed human breast tissue are treated to clear out the lipids, without changing the chemistry and architecture in order to make it transparent. In this way, it is possible to see inside the tissue and get a better look at the morphological changes, as shown in the cover image12,13. Whilst this workflow allowed the researchers to detect early lesions and local tissue remodeling, the cause and consequences of these aberrations in the TDLUs remain unknown.

Possible connection between the immune microenvironment and the ‘unwanted journey’

Various studies have indicated that immune cells and their factors are associated with DCIS15,16,17,18. Therefore, we investigated whether the immune microenvironment was involved in the observed aberrations inside the TDLUs of at-risk patients. The immune microenvironment refers to immune cells, cytokines, and other factors. Research has shown that this microenvironment cues tumor progression15. Based on their interaction with the immune microenvironment, immune cells can be categorized into ‘anti-tumor cells’ that are protective against tumor growth, and ‘pro-tumor cells’ that may stimulate tumor growth15. In our study, we characterized the immune microenvironment into two disease-free cosmetic breast reductions of ‘healthy’ women, and two cancer-free resections from BRCA mutation carriers who were 30–40-years-old, using immunofluorescence. Immunofluorescence is a 2D-microscopy technique that is used to locate a specific antigen in tissues using an antibody that has been labeled with a fluorescent dye. Via this technique, we looked at specific types of immune cells called T cells. There are two different subtypes of T cells: CD4+ T cells that help fight against infections, and CD8+ T cells that produce cytotoxins to kill cancer cells and other invaders. Additionally, it is possible to identify CD3+ T cells that represent activated T cells. We started by focusing on CD3+ T cells to determine their presence in human breast tissue. Literature has shown that CD4+ and CD8+ T cells belong to the ‘anti-tumor cell’ category, which makes them the ideal cell type to identify in both disease-free breasts and in breast tissues of BRCA mutation carriers15,16.

Research highlight: potential biomarker or therapy?

Our study profiled the different cell types of the immune system and their distribution in the 3D analyzed human breast. By drawing spatial correlations between the immune profiles and the 3D ductal morphology, we assessed if certain immune cell types were more or less frequent in areas of the ductal trees. Interestingly, the results showed that whilst CD3+ T cells occurred in equal numbers throughout the entire human breast, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells only accumulated in some areas. This indicated activity of the immune system in some TDLUs. However, it remained unclear what the differences in immune cells meant and if they could contribute to a potential biomarker. Further research will be needed to assess whether these immune cells localize to morphologically abnormal ducts, and to investigate their role in the removal of early cancerous cells.

Recognition of the investment of research

Our research concluded that T cell types are differently localized in the epithelium of normal ‘healthy’ human TDLUs and in early lesions. These findings, however, were restricted to a small number of human specimens and therefore further empirical research is needed on this subject. Nevertheless, these results will allow comprehensive follow-up research to find a potential biomarker that distinguishes between DCIS lesions that progress to invasive disease from those that remain indolent and do not require treatment. This could help reduce the overtreatment of DCIS patients. The immune microenvironment likely plays a role in early human ductal transformation and may therefore contribute to breast cancer. This is of interest to women like Sarah since there is hope for future research to prevent their ‘unwanted journeys’.

* Fictional person

If you are going through an ‘unwanted journey’ or know someone with breast cancer and want to talk about it, please contact ‘Borstkankervereniging Nederland’ (030 291 7222) or visit the webpage ‘kanker.nl’.

Author information:

Joyce Catsman is a second-year Biomedical Sciences master student at VU Amsterdam, specializing in Immunology and International Public Health.

At the labs of Prof. Dr. Jelle Wesseling and Prof. Dr. Jacco van Rheenen, Division of Molecular Pathology at the Netherlands Cancer Institute, she studied the role of immune cells in breast cancer initiation in human breast tissue of BRCA and non-BRCA mutation carriers.

Acknowledgements:

This research was supported by the Netherlands Cancer Institute, division of Molecular Pathology by the group of Prof. Dr. Jelle Wesseling and the group of Prof. Dr. Jacco van Rheenen. This project would never have been possible without the support and guidance of various people at the NKI, with special thanks to my supervisors Prof. Dr. Jelle Wesseling and Dr. Hendrik Messal. 

This article was also supported by the VU:SCI Magazine. I want to thank the editorial team of VU:SCI Magazine, my mentor Madison Carr, and Dr. Hendrik Messal for their feedback and support throughout the writing process of this article.

Cover image source: 3D image of terminal duct lobular units (TDLUs) inside human breast tissue by Dr. Hendrik Messal

Further reading:

  1. Oncology Nurse Advisor. Choose your words carefully when using metaphors for cancer – Oncology Nurse Advisor. Medical News Today. Published November 6, 2014. Accessed January 29, 2023. https://www.oncologynurseadvisor.com/home/headlines/choose-your-words-carefully-when-using-metaphors-for-cancer/ ↩︎
  2. Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, The Netherlands Cancer Registry. National Monitoring of the Breast Cancer Screening Programme in the Netherlands 2019.; 2021. Accessed May 7, 2023. https://iknl.nl/getmedia/2f9606c1-0f56-40c4-8925-e9e030d12d90/National-monitoring-breast-cancer-screening-in-the-Netherlands-2019.pdf ↩︎
  3. Visser LL. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast : cancer precursor or not? Published online March 10, 2020. Accessed March 22, 2022. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/86290 ↩︎
  4. Figueroa JD, Pfeiffer RM, Patel DA, et al. Terminal Duct Lobular Unit Involution of the Normal Breast: Implications for Breast Cancer Etiology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(10):286. doi:10.1093/JNCI/DJU286 ↩︎
  5. Cassent A, Almekinders M, Mulder C, et al. DCIS: when cancer is not really cancer. Nat Rev – Unpubl.:1-39. ↩︎
  6. Visser LL, Elshof LE, Schaapveld M, et al. Clinicopathological Risk Factors for an Invasive Breast Cancer Recurrence after Ductal Carcinoma In Situ—A Nested Case–Control Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(15):3593-3601. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0201 ↩︎
  7. Ellis IO. Intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast: morphology, associated risk and molecular biology. Mod Pathol. 2010;23(2):S1-S7. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2010.56 ↩︎
  8. Cooper GM. The Development and Causes of Cancer. In: The Cell: A Molecular Approach. 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates; 2000. Accessed June 23, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9963/ ↩︎
  9. Almekinders MMM, Schaapveld M, Thijssen B, et al. Breast adipocyte size associates with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer risk after ductal carcinoma in situ. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7(1). doi:10.1038/S41523-021-00232-W ↩︎
  10. van Seijen M, Lips EH, Thompson AM, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: to treat or not to treat, that is the question. Br J Cancer. 2019;121(4):292. doi:10.1038/S41416-019-0478-6 ↩︎
  11. van Luijt PA, Heijnsdijk EAM, Fracheboud J, et al. The distribution of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) grade in 4232 women and its impact on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18(1):47. doi:10.1186/S13058-016-0705-5 ↩︎
  12. Messal HA, van Rheenen J, Scheele CLGJ. An Intravital Microscopy Toolbox to Study Mammary Gland Dynamics from Cellular Level to Organ Scale. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2021;26(1):9-27. doi:10.1007/S10911-021-09487-2 ↩︎
  13. Messal HA, Almagro J, Zaw Thin M, et al. Antigen retrieval and clearing for whole-organ immunofluorescence by FLASH. Nat Protoc. 2020;16(1):239-262. doi:10.1038/s41596-020-00414-z ↩︎
  14. Messal HA, Unpublished, Netherlands Cancer Inst. 2021 ↩︎
  15. Tower H, Ruppert M, Britt K. The Immune Microenvironment of Breast Cancer Progression. Cancers – Rev. 2019;11(1375):1-15. doi:10.3390/cancers11091375 ↩︎
  16. Emens LA. Breast cancer immunobiology driving immunotherapy: vaccines and immune checkpoint blockade. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2012;12(12):1597-1611. doi:10.1586/era.12.147 ↩︎
  17. Nelson AC, Machado HL, Schwertfeger KL. Breaking Through to the Other Side: Microenvironment Contributions to DCIS Initiation and Progression. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2018;23(4):207-221. doi:10.1007/s10911-018-9409-z ↩︎
  18. Gil CR, Alcazar D, Huh SJ, et al. Immune escape in breast cancer during in situ to invasive carcinoma transition HHS Public Access. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(10):1098-1115. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0222 ↩︎